Mechanisms of Social Control - 5
Social Power Strategies in Holy Works
In the Holy Works, to help people to accept the existence of the Superior Being, the sages presented Him in terms, and drawing on analogies, that people could understand. Of course, the Supreme Being would have to be male, since in that era, the more powerful persons in almost every social situation, with very few exceptions, would be male. Powerful kings were a part of the life of that day, as well as subsequently, and God was then represented as an all-powerful king, sometimes benevolent, sometimes vengeful, but expecting complete and unquestioned obedience. A more gentle conception presents God as shepherd and humanity as His flock. Implied in such a relationship is a lack of real consent by the members of the flock, but yet unquestioned obedience to even the slightest suggestion by the Shepherd. The flock exists through the activity of the Shepherd, who guides them, provides sustenance, prods them if they do not follow. Without Him, the flock would collapse into an unprotected mass of dispersed individuals (Foucault, 1981, as cited in Hindess, 1996, p. 118).
But, of course, the Lord is much more powerful than shepherds or kings. Throughout the Bible and other holy works, the omnipotence, omniscience, and omnipresence of the Lord are emphasized, beginning with Genesis and the majestic account of the power of the Lord in creating heaven and earth and everything therein (Genesis 1). The Koran has a strong conception of God's absolute omniscience and omnipotence (Armstrong, 1993, pp. 163 ff.). Certainly, with the descriptions of heaven and hell, in the Bible and the Koran, in the strident words of religious ministers, in art and literature, the Lord's ultimate coercive power and reward power are dramatically established. In Jewish texts, such as the Bible and prayer book, thirteen attributes are ascribed to God, including omniscience, omnipotence, transcendence, merciful, forgiving, gracious, and long-suffering. These are chanted and repeated at many significant occasions. These attributes "attest to the sense of human dependence on a power which compels reverence and obedience" (Werblowsky & Wigoder, 1965, p. 49). As in the Bible, the Koran encourages adherents to be aware of the benevolence of the Allah, who brings forth a being from a drop of sperm, makes it easy for him to go through life, and may thereafter raise him again from the dead (Koran 80:24-32). Allah is given 99 names or attributes, indicating greater positive qualities than those in any other being: rich and infinite, giver of life, knower of all things, producer of speech; he dominates; he gives, he takes away; he brings low and exalts. These names are recited, counted on beads, and chanted as a mantra (Armstrong, 1993, p. 150).
Sins and legitimate power.
The story of Adam and Eve (Genesis 3) not only demonstrates God's omniscience and His reward and coercive power, but offers the first instance of God's legitimate power of equity, based on a compensatory norm. Such a power base stems from the target's obligation to obey the agent to atone for an inappropriate or hurtful act that the target has committed previously. Guilt seems to play such a role in many religions. The concept of sin also serves this purpose, not only in invoking guilt, but with the threat of punishment that accompanies it. Augustine, in a particularly harsh
doctrine, stated that Adam's and Eve's descendants must consider themselves as having committed this original sin for having disobeyed God. This sin is passed on through the sexual act, and believers must atone for it by complete surrender and obedience. For those who believe that we are born in sin, and from birth, the sense that we should feel an obligation to atone for it, the Lord's legitimate power of equity would be overwhelming, and supported also by coercive power, the threat of extreme punishment after death. But, for some branches of Christianity, the words of Paul give some relief, in stating that Jesus suffered and died on the cross "for our sins," thus granting collective atonement. But those who accept this interpretation are not completely off the hook, for it is emphasized that they now have a special obligation to the Lord, in the name of Jesus, to love and obey Him:(5) the legitimate power of reciprocity. For some Christians, the original sin is washed away in baptism, thus freeing the baby from even this obligation. But, in adulthood, there is renewed emphasis on behaviors in which almost everyone engages, and which are seen as sinful, invoking guilt and an obligation to comply.
In traditional Christianity, the confession of sins is made both collectively and individually, again with a vow for compliance with religious law in return for expiation. In the Jewish most holy Day of Atonement there is a recitation of every possible sin, which, the worshipper says, "we have committed"; the worshipper then assumes a collective obligation not only for his/her own past misdeeds but for those committed by others. In asking forgiveness, the penitent also vows to adhere to proper behavior and thought in the future. This same device is used to emphasize God's legitimate power of reciprocity: After all, it is important for all Jews to feel that they were each personally freed by God from slavery in Egypt. For this, they are all eternally obligated. The Lord's extreme legitimate power of reciprocity is further strengthened by the account of the Covenant on Mount Sinai: The Jewish people, in return for a promise of protection and continued support from the Lord, pledged themselves to complete obedience and acceptance only of the one Lord.
But this was further strengthened by the words of Joshua, warning, with extreme coercive power, that if they did not honor the covenant with the Lord, he would destroy them (Joshua 24:24). This is demonstrated dramatically in the tragic story of Nadab and Abihu, sons of Aaron, Moses's brother. They had obeyed the words of the Lord in performing a series of rituals, none of which could be seen as having a rational basis other than that they were commanded to do so. Then they slipped and took into the tabernacle burning incense, other than what the Lord had commanded. As punishment the Lord immediately sent out flames that consumed them. That event is then recounted several times to emphasize the extreme coercive power of the Lord, with severe punishment for even for the slightest disobedience, regardless of reason or rationality (Leviticus 9, 10).
Go to Part 6