Unit 3
   English 201: 
  Masterpieces of Western Literature
.Unit 3 Reading Course Reading Entry Page
Introduction Background .Explication Questions Review

Review:

You witnessed the inescapable truth about human life: that no matter how glorious, it ends.

Book 24 reviews the lessons of The Iliad.The essential lesson is this.Power & violence are instrumentally necessary for life in this world & an end in themselves – desirable for no other reason than the feel of power, dominance, & glory.This will-to-power parallels the infantile experience of libido.Nothing else matters but my exaltation.If I am not now God, I will be divine, unopposed, eternal.Strangely, this very project of life does not meet a concrete enemy & obstacle; worse, its initial success whirls into disaster.Power & control (principle, fate, logos) lose tensional balance.The result is not total power & eternal life, but cancer.Book 24 illustrates this lesson in 4 ways. 
1.The problem with an unconditional dedication to power is injustice (dike). 
No doubt, you found AK’s treatment of HK’s corpse disgusting:
24.16he yoked his team, with HK
........tied behind, to drag him out, 3 times
........around PAT’s tomb.

Apollo charges that:
24.46Murderous AK has your [the Olympians] willing help--
........a man who shows no decency, implacable,
.......barbarous in his ways as a wild lion

Hera answers:
24.67 Lord of the silver bow, your words would be
........acceptable if one had a mind to honor
........HK & AK equally.
........But KH suckled at a woman’s breast,
........AK is the first-born of a goddess

This seems to be a horrific inversion.HK is the moral champion, the very person of virtue.AK is a baby, a narcissist who is alternatively awesome & contemptible.How can Hera defend AK over HK?We need to perform two operations to find the answer.First, what does each character personify?AK personifies power.HK personifies virtue.Which is more fundamental?If we could choose only one (like Paris), which would we choose?The world of the Iliad illustrates the results of unconditionally choosing power regardless of any other consideration.The second operation asks whether or not you wish to live in such a world?The heroic world is awesome, stark, & alluring.The cost of giving in to that allurement (Helen) is that you give up the (reasonable) right to object that it is injust; that there is an unbridgeable gap between the divinities & humankind, between aristocratic warriors & everyone else.If power is the only value, the answer is a sneer.Was it president Nixon who said, “let them twist in the wind”?Aeschylus ends his first play about AG with Klytemnestra sneering comment about those who want justice: “let them howl—they’re impotent.You [Aegisthus] & I have power now” (p. 663).

2.Power consumes every virtue, every value other than itself.
This point is made by Priam when he impotently rages at his remaining, cowardly sons:
24.304you misbegotten whelps,
.... ..... shame of my house!Would go you had been killed
...... ... instead of HK . . .
...... .. I fathered
.... .... first-rate men, in our great Troy, but now
..... .... I swear not one is left.
24.303  These poltroons [cowards] are left
  ..      hollow men, dancer, heroes of the dance

An unconditional commitment to power engages the best men (best in the sense of power) in battles without victors.The victor who prevails in one battle must meet others & still others.The result is that the best citizens come to the fore in defense of civilization & are consumed, leaving the cowardly rats & cockroaches & lords of the dance to inherit what they gave their lives to defend.The only way out of this collapse is to acknowledge that there must be values, in addition to power, that we should be committed to.

3.When everyone is unconditionally committed to nothing but power, success is grief.
This point is illustrated by the weeping scene involving Priam & AK.These 2 are the victors.HK could barely stand before the awesome & terrifying AK.It is laughable to think that anyone among the lords of the dance could face HK.The fact that Apollo uses Paris to destroy AK, as though by accident, is no victory.It is as though Gen. Eisenhower was hit by a bus crossing a street.What would that illustrate?
Some readers of The Iliad see a change in AK in this scene where:
24.609in AK
   ..     the evocation of his father stirred
    ..    new longing, & an ache of grief.
24.613the old king huddled at AK’s feet
     ..   wept, & wept for HK, killer of men,
   ..    while great AK wept for his own father
    ..    as for PAT once again; & sobbing
    ..    filled the room.

  Priam Ransom's Hektor's Corpse From Akhilleus

I don’t see any change.Two points resist the idea of a fundamental reorientation of values.“New longing” seems to me to imply a new object for the same old emotional circuit.Just as the loss of Briseis was replaced by the “new longing” of loss for PAT; or rage at AG replaced by HK; here the grief for PAT (really AK’s self-pity at not being able to affect fate & escape his own mortality), is temporarily replaced by grief for his father. It is simply another emotional indulgence in a life of similarly sweeping & deep emotion.Secondly, isn’t it interesting that Homer characterizes Priam as weeping for “HK, killer of men.”What of all the men HK killed?Sure we can say that he was nobly defending the city against savage force.But those men had wives & children.Remember Diomedes saying, “we came here under god” (9.58)?
Violence & power that has overcome ever obstacle, & perhaps, every principle, does not glory in its own victory.It weeps at its own success, having cynically proved that there is no reality but power & death.

4. A single loss means totally erasure.
Each generation of the polis is a link in the chain of civilization.If a single link in the chain is broken, the temporal chain of cultural heritage is irremediably ruptured. This happened to great civilizations in Egypt, in Meso-America, in Africa (to Carthage & perhaps to sub-Saharan cultures).This tragedy is voiced by AND:
24.867You’ve been torn from life [HK],
    ..  my husband, in young manhood, & you leave me
    ..   empty in our hall.The boy’s a child [your son]
.......... . .I doubt
    ..   he’ll come to manhood.Long before, greatly Troy
    ..   will go down plundered . . .
......... now that you are lost, who guarded it.

The Iliad began something like a college football game or any other athletic rivalry where guys bet on Troy Aikman or Emmitt Smith – who is more valuable to the team?The brute power of AK as a fullback who will knock the teeth out of Jack Ham or any other linebacker.Or Troy whose finesse & intelligence & control will put the ball in the end zone?The display of power was intoxicating.The level of violence seemed acceptable.By the end of The Iliad, we should be dragging.Our team didn’t just win, it left young men maimed & dead.Something went very wrong.We leave the stadium not sure when we will return; not knowing exactly how we will return because our enthusiasm for the spectacle is gone.Our great hero [AK], who we cheered on to beat hell out of any adversary, is himself in tears.There must be a better game or a better way to play this game (life). Homer is about to show us a better world.If Homer had begun his instruction with the Odyssey, suggesting that it is a good thing to consider the outlook & advice of little girls, he would have invited ridicule from the jocks & fighter pilots & Wall St. wizards – the men of power, however it is defined.He had to first disgust you with the celebration of nothing but power before you were ready to consider an alternative way of life.

Next week we will begin an odyssey to consider if we can imagine a world based on values in addition to power.Homer never imagined a world without the grim working of power (cash, violence, prestige, class).But he did dream of a world where power did not so immediately destroy beauty.  See you then for unit 04.